Legal Opinion

State v. M.J.B.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 4, 1991No. 90-1275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

M.J.B., a juvenile, was charged with petit theft, and the trial date was set for June 7, 1990. At the time of trial (before jeopardy attached) the state moved for a continuance, the motion was denied, and the state announced a nol pros. At that point, defense counsel asserted that the nol pros was a “sleazy tactic” and that the case should be dismissed by the court due to the state’s “failure to present evidence of delinquency.” The state attorney argued that, since the case was nol prossed, it was no longer before the court for further action. Nevertheless, the trial court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. S.M.F.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. State v. KahmkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State v. PadronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Fassi v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. AguilarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. State v. MJBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API