Wilbur-Ellis & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Keefe, Judge:
During the course of this trial a total of 73 protests were consolidated here for the reason that the merchandise covered thereby was the same materials, to wit: a commodity invoiced as fish cake or scrap and fish meal. The collector assessed the fish meal as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of the Tariff Act of 1922 and the fish cake or scrap as a waste at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1457. In protest 319610-G it was assessed at 10 per centum ad valorem as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article under paragraph 1459.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Protest 410797-G of Wilbur Ellis Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Protest 459852-G of Hart-Hill Grain Co.United States Customs Court · 1940
- Protests 344319-G of California Packing Corp.United States Customs Court · 1939
- Protests 404959-G of California Packing Co.United States Customs Court · 1939