Legal Opinion

Wilbur-Ellis & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 26, 1939No. C. D. 153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

During the course of this trial a total of 73 protests were consolidated here for the reason that the merchandise covered thereby was the same materials, to wit: a commodity invoiced as fish cake or scrap and fish meal. The collector assessed the fish meal as a nonenumerated manufactured article at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of the Tariff Act of 1922 and the fish cake or scrap as a waste at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1457. In protest 319610-G it was assessed at 10 per centum ad valorem as a nonenumerated unmanufactured article under paragraph 1459.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Protest 410797-G of Wilbur Ellis Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  2. Protest 459852-G of Hart-Hill Grain Co.United States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Protests 344319-G of California Packing Corp.United States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Protests 404959-G of California Packing Co.United States Customs Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API