Legal Opinion · Dissent

White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1984No. 81-5348Published

1DissentFletcher, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

There are three separate and independent bases to support the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to the Tribe under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1982). The Tribe has raised civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) sufficient to support the section 1988 award based upon (1) Arizona’s alleged violations of the federal laws regulating the harvest and sale of reservation timber, 25 U.S.C. §§ 406-407, 466 (1982); (2) its alleged due process violations; and (3) its alleged equal protection violations by the state.

The Tribe raised these claims in its district court…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API