Legal Opinion
INVISTA North America S.à.r.l. v. M & G USA Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 25, 2013No. Civ. No. 11-1007-SLR-CJBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
1. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs INVISTA North America S.a.r.l. and Auriga Polymers Inc.1 (collectively, “Invista”) are suing M & G USA Corporation and M & G Polymers USA, LLC (collectively, “M & G”) for infringement of United States Patent Nos. No. 7,919,159 (“the '159 patent”), 7,943,216 (“the '216 patent”), and 7,879,930 (“the '930 patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). (D.I. 1; D.I. 7) M & G has asserted counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of the patents-in-suit. (D.I. 42) The patents-in-suit…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- PACIRA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. EVENUS PHARMACEUTICALS LABORATORIES INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023