Cash Finance Service No. 3, Inc. v. Rhoden
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Judge ad hoc.
This is an action on a promissory note under the Small Loan Act, LSA-R.S. 6:571 et seq., which was originally for the sum of $300. After certain payments had been made, plaintiff alleges there is due the sum of $280.55, with interest and attorney’s fees as provided in the note.
To this petition the defendant filed exceptions of no cause or right of action, which he later requested to be and were referred to the merits and are not seriously urged here.
The defendant’s answer is one of general denial on pertinent allegations of plaintiff’s petition, with the affirmative…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- De Latour v. LalaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Accounts Supervision Company v. AtleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Excel Finance Mid City, Inc. v. MeilleurLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Seybold Finance Service v. SchwanerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Feliciana Finance Company v. BatemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Seaboard Finance Corporation v. StipelcovichLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- X-L Finance Co. v. DonawayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Finance System of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. TerrellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972