Legal Opinion

Baldwin Kitchen Cabinet Corp. v. Artz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The said last provision of the order, which directs the cancellation of the New York County judgment, is not authorized by the provisions of section 530 of the Civil Practice Act or section 20 of the Lien Law; nor do we find any authority, statutory or otherwise, which sanctions the procedure adopted or the order made. If, on the facts presented, the owner is entitled to any relief with respect to said judgment, he should seek it in the action in New York County, and not in any collateral action or proceeding (see 1 Freeman, Judgments [5th ed.], § 305; Crouse v. McVickar, 207 N. Y. 213,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingalls Iron Works Company v. Fehlhaber CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  2. Chestnut Hill Real Estate v. Contractors Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API