Legal Opinion
Borough of Hasbrouck Heights v. O'Brien
New Jersey Special Statutory Court
Decided June 30, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDel Mas, J.
All parties have agreed that the two above-entitled eases should be argued and decided together, the facts and law in both cases being the same.
The two defendants having each been convicted of violating an ordinance of the Borough of Hasbrouck Heights in a summary proceeding and sentenced to ninety (90) days in the county jail, petitioned me for a review of the proceedings.
These are not appeals under R. S. 40:87-42; N. J. S. A. 40:87-42, but are proceedings authorized by R. S. 2:215-7; N. J. S. A. 2:215-7, which provides for a review by the judge of the Court of Common Pleas and not by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RoweSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Dziatkiewicz v. Township of MaplewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Linden Park Blood Horse Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Haviland v. EganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- State v. DeMaioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McDonaldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- State v. Home Fuel Oil Co. of RidgewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949