Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Cornish Lumber Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1954No. 39094PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E 1 HRIDGE, J.

The issue is whether appellee, an employer, failed to secure the payment of workmen’s compensation to his employee, appellant’s intestate, at the time of injury. We hold that appellee failed to comply with this requirement of the act, and that appellant therefore has a right to bring this suit at law for damages.

Appellant, Floyd McCoy, in his own behalf and for the use and benefit of his wife and children, brought this suit in the Circuit Court of Lauderdale County against W. H. Cornish, doing business as Cornish Lumber Company, appellee, asking damages for the death of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Talge Mahogany Co. v. BurrowsIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Samuels v. Munson S. S. Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  3. Coffin v. BloodworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Akin v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Jones v. BrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Evans v. AverySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. Taylor v. CROSBY FOREST PRODUCTS COMPANYMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Arthur L. Summer v. Victor Chemical Works, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Christian v. McDonaldMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lámar v. Thomas Fowler Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API