Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 18, 1992No. CR-91-1311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, James Truman Whitehead, appeals from the summary denial of his petition for post-conviction relief under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. The appellant alleged in his petition that newly discovered evidence existed, warranting a new trial. Specifically, the appellant maintains that during his trial one of the state’s witnesses perjured himself on the stand. The record contains an affidavit by one of the state’s witnesses in which the witness states that the testimony he gave at the appellant’s trial was false.

The trial court denied his petition without an evidentiary hearing.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API