Legal Opinion

Urban Investment & Development Co. v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 10, 1975No. 59061PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leighton

This appeal is from a judgment entered in two consolidated suits for possession of land filed by the landlords of a tenant to whom they were renting stores in two shopping centers. Notices terminating the tenancies were served on the ground that the tenant’s parent corporation had filed bankruptcy proceedings, an occurrence which the landlords claimed was a default that entitled them to demand surrender of the rented premises. The issue presented is whether the landlords had the right to terminate the leases and thus were entitled to possession of the stores. The facts giving rise to this…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bonde v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Alwood v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Waukegan Times Theatre Corp. v. ConradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dargis v. Paradise Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Lee v. North Dakota Park ServiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Chemical Petroleum Exchange, Inc. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Central National Bank v. Fleetwood Realty Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API