Legal Opinion

Falcone v. Laquer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 2014No. Nos. 3D13-2122, 3D13-490PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalter, J.

These are consolidated appeals from non-final orders denying the appellants’ motions to compel arbitration of claims asserted in the appellees’ second and third amended complaints. We dismiss as moot *1172the appeal taken from the order relating to the second amended complaint.1 We affirm the trial court’s order relating to the third amended complaint, and we provide this opinion simply to clarify that we have not in any way receded from our prior opinion requiring arbitration of certain specific cross-claims in four foreclosure cases, as detailed in 13 Parcels LLC v. Laquer, 104 So.3d 377 (Fla.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Raymond James Financial v. SaldukasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Vanderberg v. RiosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. 13 Parcels LLC v. LaquerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laquer v. FalconeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Spencer T. Calvert v. Steven A. Aleckson and Jennifer Rae AlecksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API