Legal Opinion

United States v. Noethe

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 13, 2025No. 4:24-cv-04109Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4:24-CV-04109-CCT Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF vs. THE NOETHES’ CROSSCLAIMS URBAN H. NOETHE, KRISTI S. NOETHE, LINCOLN COUNTY TREASURER, VINSON LLC, SECURITY STATE BANK, CHANCELLOR, SD, Defendants. In this foreclosure action by the government, defendants Vinson LLC and Security State Bank filed separate motions to dismiss the crossclaims filed against them by Urban and Kristi Noethe. Dockets 24, 27. The Noethes have not filed a response, and the time for doing so has expired. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hamilton v. PalmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. Anders Rydholm v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  5. Hofeldt v. MehlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API