State v. Atkinson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant appeals from the entry of separate convictions and sentences after a trial on stipulated facts in which he was found guilty of attempted assault, ORS 163.185; ORS 161.405, and possession of a weapon by an inmate. ORS 166.275. We affirm.
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in refusing to merge his convictions. ORS 161.062(1) 1 and ORS 161.067 2 establish when convictions merge. Defendant concedes that, normally, the convictions here would not merge, because attempted assault and possession of a weapon by an inmate do not require proof of identical elements. However, he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DeAngelo v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FranskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. FranskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.