Legal Opinion

State v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 9, 1989No. 87C-21930; CA A49699PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals from the entry of separate convictions and sentences after a trial on stipulated facts in which he was found guilty of attempted assault, ORS 163.185; ORS 161.405, and possession of a weapon by an inmate. ORS 166.275. We affirm.

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in refusing to merge his convictions. ORS 161.062(1) 1 and ORS 161.067 2 establish when convictions merge. Defendant concedes that, normally, the convictions here would not merge, because attempted assault and possession of a weapon by an inmate do not require proof of identical elements. However, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeAngelo v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. FranskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. FranskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API