Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1981No. Appeal, No. 2287 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Harrison Comstock (claimant) appeals here from a decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which held that claim*381ant had terminated his employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature, and was thus disqualified from receiving benefits by Section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. (1937) 2897, Second Ex. Sess., as amended, 43 P.S. §802(b) (l).1

The facts in this case are not in dispute. On March 23, 1979, claimant, because of a lack of work, was laid off from his job as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Fisher v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Ernst v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Weaver v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Maines v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Stankiewicz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Mastroianni v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API