Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Bautista
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 4, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CELR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, Tovarick Bautista appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated September 22, 2003, as granted the petition to the extent of directing him to provide pre-arbitration discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellant to provide pre-arbitration discovery (see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Moya, 288 AD2d 309 [2001]; Matter of State Farm…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re Allstate Insurance v. BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Allstate Insurance v. MoyaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- State Farm Insurance v. McManusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. SerpicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007