Legal Opinion

Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 29, 2023No. 5:21-cv-01811Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 MARK ZAVISLAK, Case No. 5:21-cv-01811-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE v. 10 Re: ECF Nos. 209, 210, 211, 212 11 NETFLIX, INC., Defendant. 12 13 Presently before the Court are Defendant Netflix Inc.’s (“Netflix) motions in limine 14 (“MIL”) to exclude or admit certain evidence from trial.1 ECF Nos. 209, 210, 211, 212. Having 15 considered the parties’ briefing, the Court rules on Netflix’s MILs as discussed below. 16 I. DISCUSSION 17 A. Netflix’s MIL to Exclude Hearsay Statements 18…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bulthuis v. Rexall Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Boyd v. City of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Durham v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  4. Little v. BarremeSupreme Court of the United States · 1804

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API