Legal Opinion

Linn v. Pitts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 1993No. 90-CV-0235; CA A72501Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for nuisance, arising out of farming activities on defendants’ neighboring parcel. At the close of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, defendants moved to dismiss on the ground that they were immune from liability under ORS 30.930 to ORS 30.947. The trial court granted the motion, and also assessed attorney fees against plaintiffs pursuant to ORS 20.105(1). Plaintiffs appeal from the resulting judgment. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiffs’ only contention on the merits of the dismissal is that, in several respects, the immunity from nuisance liability that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Seely v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Carleton v. LowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API