Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of Harlfinger

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawyer, S.:

Involved in this proceeding is the contested claim of the county of Schenectady for the sum of $899.80.

The consideration of the claim is alleged to be board and care furnished the decedent, Mary M. Humphries, at the county hospital of Schenectady county, between the 14th day of October,

1919, and the 23d day of October, 1922, at the rate of six dollars per week.

On the 14th day of October, 1919, the testatrix was placed in the Schenectady County Hospital for observation by Charles Humphries, her nephew, who, at that time, agreed to pay the county for her care and support. Examination…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Albany v. . McNamaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Norton v. RhodesNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of CarrollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BlackNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. In re the Estate of ThomasNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  3. In re the Estate of GarrettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API