Cornell v. Utica, Ithaca & Elmira Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion for continuance of preliminary injunction, pendente Ute.
1Opinion of the CourtBoardman, J.
Ezra Cornell, plaintiff’s intestate, was the contractor for the building of a portion of the Utica, Ithaca and (Elmira railroad. He was paid in the bonds and stock of said road, but as these were not available for sale in the open market he had borrowed large sums of money upon them as collateral. His efforts as contractor were embarrassed for want of money and by reason of his large indebtedness. An arrangement was made whereby one Greenough, in the interests of the contractor and owners of the road, went to England and secured the sale of the bonds of the road, the proceeds being first…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ryan v. . DoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Leitch v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Traphagen v. . BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Bruce v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1853
- Ingraham v. BaldwinNew York Supreme Court · 1851
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marie v. GarrisonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1883
- Vanderbilt v. BennettNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1887