Schommer v. Eischens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
' Action in the district court for Renville county to recover $380 as commission on the, sale of a farm. The case was tried before Daly, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order steting aside the verdict and granting plaintiff a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Cubiam.
Action to recover $880 as a commission for procuring a purchaser for 380 acres of land in Yellow Medicine county. The cause was tried to a jury and a verdict returned in favor of the defendant. Upon motion duly made the trial court granted a new trial exclusively upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. From such an order defendant brings this appeal.
G. S. 1913, § 8001, subd 4, provides that an appeal may be taken to this court from an order granting a new trial, based exclusively upon errors occurring at the trial when it’ is so expressly stated…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pust v. HoltzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Greenberg v. National Council of Knights and Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barwald v. ThuetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921