Legal Opinion

State v. Knutson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1929No. 5256PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTSON, District Judge.

Appellant was charged with the crime of furnishing intoxicating liquor to a minor, and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Error is assigned in denying appellant’s motion in arrest of judgment, because of alleged duplicity in the information. Appellant did not demur. Such defect, if present, cannot be considered on a motion in arrest of judgment, in the absence of a previous demurrer on that ground. (C. S., secs. 8870, 8878, 9019; People v. Nash, 1 Ida. 206; People v. Stapleton, 2 Ida. 47, 3 Pac. 6; People v. Shotwell, 27 Cal. 394.)

Error is specified…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  2. State v. DureinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1905
  5. People v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1868

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. UrieIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Cook v. Skyline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hansen v. Howard O. Miller, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API