Legal Opinion

Baker v. Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 2000No. Trial No. A-9900285, Appeal No. C-000328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a jury found that the plaintiff-appellee, Anita Baker, was entitled to participate in the Workers’ Compensation Fund. The basis of Baker’s claim against the fund was that her husband, Mark Baker, had killed himself because he was suffering from “a disturbance of the mind” resulting from a previous occupational injury. In his appeal, the Administrator argues that the trial court erred by (1) failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict, (2) precluding him from impeaching Baker with a previous conviction for theft against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WrightOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. AmburgeyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Borbely v. Prestole Everlock, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kohls v. Indus. Comm. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Kohl's Department Stores v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API