Kerrick v. Stevens
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Montcalm. (Y. H. Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Defendants were sued as partners for a debt incurred by the firm for machinery furnished by plaintiff for a factory in Hastings, Minnesota. Under the charge of the court below a verdict was rendered for defendants, which depended on a denial of the existence of any partnership liability against Stevens.
On the 1st of March, 1882, the defendants entered into articles which recited the ownership by Niches of a patent for folding ladders, in which he agreed to give the others each one-third interest in Minnesota. Stevens agreed to furnish $5000 for the.purpose of putting up a factory in Hastings,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Kasishke v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Kerrick v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1885