Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Board of Managers of Murray Hill Terrace Condominium
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
This action focuses attention on a classic confrontation in *406the New York City condominium/co-op world — between those who purchase units for investment and those who purchase for their own residence.
The Murray Hill Terrace Condominium (the condominium) consists of 118 residential apartments and one ground-floor commercial unit. Plaintiff, Silvana Caruso, is the fee title owner of condominium unit 4-E, although she does not actually reside there. She commenced this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and incidental monetary damages with respect…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gambar Enterprises, Inc. v. Kelly Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- New York University v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Schoninger v. Yardarm Beach Homeowners' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Family Affair Haircutters, Inc. v. DetlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Dashew v. CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Managers of Madison Medical Building Condominium v. RamaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Board of Managers of National Plaza Condominium I v. Astoria Plaza, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Board of Managers of National Plaza Condominium I v. Astoria Plaza, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Reynolds v. Towers on the Park CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019