Legal Opinion

In Re Vogel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1982No. 56126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Pursuant to our rules establishing the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (73 Ill. 2d Rules 751 through 771), its administrator filed a complaint against respondent, John Otto Vogel. The complaint alleged that respondent had represented Arthur Hardisty from 1964 to 1976, and that during those years respondent was guilty of overreaching his client in violation of DR 5 — 101(A) of the Illinois Code of Professional Responsibility (Illinois State Bar Association 1970). The Hearing Board agreed and recommended three months’ suspension from the practice of law. The Review Board,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re SaladinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. HoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Blake's WillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. In Re AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BesleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. In the Matter of RentiersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BesleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API