Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1916No. 6722PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Le Flore County; P. C. Bolger, Judge. Action by M. M. Ryan against Walter Reynolds, and Frank Babcock files a petition for intervention. Judgment for plaintiff, =and defendant and intervener bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE C.

This is an attachment suit to enforce a landlord’s lien for the rent of certain lands for the year 1912, commenced in a justice court of Le Flore county by M. M. Ryan against Walter Reynolds. One Frank Babcock attempted to intervene, alleging that he, and not the plaintiff, Ryan, had rented the lands to defendant for that year. He was denied the right to intervene. There was judgment for plaintiff before justice, ánd uxdou appeal and trial to a jury in the county court he again prevailed.

It appears from the evidence of plaintiff that the premises involved were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Stebbens v. LonghofferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. CrozierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Waggoner v. BucklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Parker-Gordon Cigar Co. v. Wood & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API