Fargo v. Aaseth
South Dakota Supreme Court
On rehearing. No hriefs were filed by either party on the application for rehearing. • ’
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
This matter is before us on rehearing. For -the former opinion, see 30 S. D. 79, 137 N. W. 608.
The important features of the argument on rehearing were directed to the failure of the trial court to pass upon the questions of laterals, of dikes along the James river, and of damages to lands both within and without the right of way. The whole territory covered by the proposed drainage system consisting of about 32,000 acres is subject to overflow. About every other year practically the entire territory is unfit for cultivation on account of excessive moisture caused by overflow, rainfall, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lipes v. HandIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Erickson v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Roby v. Shunganunga Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Culbertson v. KnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Mason v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.