Legal Opinion

State v. Schmitt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to quash indictment.

1Opinion of the CourtMagie, J.

The indictment objected to contains one count,, and charges the defendant with having published in a public newspaper, printed in the German language, a libelous article, reflecting on William H. F. Fiedler. It sets out the article in the German language and follows it with a translation into English, accompanied with innuendoes declaring its meaning.

By the rules of criminal pleading, an indictment for libel must be based on a publication which appears on its face to be libelous in its application to the person alleged to be libeled, or it must set out such extrinsic facts as show the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Post Pub. Co. v. HallamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. State v. BrowneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  3. Eikhoff v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Squires v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. State v. OgdenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API