Legal Opinion
State v. Parrish
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1984No. 83-1950PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue presented in this appeal is whether these convictions, which were based solely on the uncorroborated testimonies of the participating undercover sheriffs deputies, must be reversed in light of R.C. 2923.03(D). Since we conclude that these deputies were not accomplices for purposes of the crime of prostitution, we hold that R.C. 2923.03(D) did not operate to bar these convictions.
R.C. 2923.03(D) reads as follows:
“No person shall be convicted of complicity under this section solely upon the testimony of an accomplice, unsupported by other evidence.”
In State v. Pearson (1980), 62 Ohio…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WacOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
- State v. PearsonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BergenOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- City of Cleveland v. KrebsOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. ZikoOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.