Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma v. Jegley

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2017No. 16-2234PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Prosecuting Attorneys for Pulaski County and Washington County, Arkansas (“the State”) appeal the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction preventing the enforcement of an Arkansas statute requiring medication-abortion providers to contract with a physician who has hospital admitting privileges. Because the district court failed to make factual findings estimating the number of women burdened by the statute, we vacate the preliminary injunction and remand for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2015, Arkansas enacted the Abortion-Inducing Drugs Safety Act…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Gonzales v. CarhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  2. In Re: Leslie Rutledge v.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. James CaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  4. Preterm-Cleveland v. Stephanie McCloudCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. Hopkins v. JegleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API