Guntipally v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case Nos. 16-cr-00189-JSC-1 Plaintiff, 21-cv-03304-JSC 8 v. 9 ORDER RE: HABEAS PETITION 10 SUNITHA GUNTIPALLY, Re: Dkt. No. 433 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Sunitha Guntipally’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct 14 her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Dkt. No. 433.)1 Ms. Guntipally is proceeding without 15 representation by a lawyer. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court determines 16 that an evidentiary hearing is not required because Ms.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.