Legal Opinion

Guntipally v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 23, 2022No. 3:21-cv-03304Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case Nos. 16-cr-00189-JSC-1 Plaintiff, 21-cv-03304-JSC 8 v. 9 ORDER RE: HABEAS PETITION 10 SUNITHA GUNTIPALLY, Re: Dkt. No. 433 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Sunitha Guntipally’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct 14 her sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Dkt. No. 433.)1 Ms. Guntipally is proceeding without 15 representation by a lawyer. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court determines 16 that an evidentiary hearing is not required because Ms.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API