Legal Opinion

In Re Entergy Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2004No. 03-0024PublishedCited by 318 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

This dispute arises from a private settlement agreement incorporated in a Public Utility Commission order. After the underlying lawsuit was filed, the trial court denied Entergy Corporation’s 1 Motion to Transfer Venue, Motion to Dismiss for Want of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, and Motion to Abate. Entergy, having failed to secure relief from the court of appeals, now seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court on the basis that the Public Utility Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter of this dispute. Because we agree, we conditionally grant the writ.

I. Background

In 1992,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cash America International Inc. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by318 opinions

  1. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. LpTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Houston Municipal Employees Pension System v. FerrellTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., LPTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Cameron Appraisal District v. RourkTexas Supreme Court · 2006

313 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API