Mihalcoe v. Holub
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of New Kent county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs assign error. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This action of assumpsit was brought by Anna Mihalcoe and her sons, John, George and Michael Mihalcoe, against P. L. Holub upon an account for board and lodging of Anna Holub, his wife, and their two minor children from May 5, 1913, to December 8, 1918. The plaintiffs were the mother and brothers, respectively, of Mrs. Anna Holub. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and thereupon the plaintiffs obtained this writ of error.
On May 5, 1913, and for some time prior thereto, the defendant and his wife and two small children resided with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Finn v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- National Valley Bank v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
- Bell v. MoonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
- Jackson's Adm'r v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Long v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- Steele v. IsikoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- McClaugherty v. McClaughertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.