Legal Opinion
Doan v. Aiken & McGlauklin, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion of plaintiffs for leave to renew their prior motion for partial summary judgment (see, Matter of Kennedy v Coughlin, 172 AD2d 666; Karlin v Bridges, 172 AD2d 644, 645). We conclude, however, that the court erred upon renewal in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Cary L. Doan (plaintiff) alleged that, while working on a construction site owned by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Karlin v. BridgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Carlos v. Rochester General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Antunes v. 950 Park Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Parsolano v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Donohue v. Elite Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abramo v. Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Laisney v. ZellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Spratt v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997