Legal Opinion

Webb v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 20, 1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

CASE 31 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Civil Code, sec. 93. Rev. Stat., 230, chap. 80, sec. 26. 18 B. Mon., 650; Chapman vs. Stockioell. CITED— 14 B. Mon., 489; Devine vs. Mitchell. 1 J. J. Mar., 500; Boyce vs. Watson, 9 Dana, 412; Savage vs. Carter. 17 B. M., 211; Black vs. Bush. 12 B. M., 357; Peyton vs. Lewis. 8 Dana, 298; Connell vs. Sandridge's adm'i. 6 B. M., 130; Pearson vs. Kelly. Hardings Rep., 535; Reading vs. Metcalfe.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE BOBEBTSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Perceiving no substantial error in tbe personal judgment against the appellant Webb, rendered at the March term, 1866, that judgment is affirmed.

But the Madison circuit court having no jurisdiction to enforce an alleged lien on land in Estill county, the j udgment in rem, rendered at the June term, 1866, is reversed, and the cause remanded for execution on the judgment in personam.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reddick v. United States Building & Loan Association's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Doty v. Deposit Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898