Legal Opinion
Bartus v. Riccardi
Utica City Court
Decided October 20, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold H. Hymes, J.
The plaintiff is a franchised representative of Acousticon, a manufacturer of hearing aids. On January 15, 1966, the defendant signed a contract to purchase a Model A-660 Acousticon hearing aid from the plaintiff. The defendant specified Model A-660 because he had been tested at a hearing aid clinic and had been informed that the best hearing aid for his condition was this Acousticon model. An ear mold was fitted to the defendant and the plaintiff ordered Model A-660 from Acousticon.
On February 2, 1966, in response to a call from the plaintiff the defendant went to the plaintiff’s office for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Portfolio v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Lowinson v. NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- T. W. Oil, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Allied Semi-Conductors International, Ltd. v. Pulsar Components International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Joc Oil USA, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980