Legal Opinion

Foelske v. Stockhausen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

• The sole question necessary for us to consider upon this record is whether there was an abuse of discretion by the trial court in granting an emergency extension of the redemption period, application for which was made under the provisions of sec. 278.106, Stats. This section, after reciting the existence of a public emergency growing out of the present depression, resulting in numerous foreclosures of mortgages, with the result that property values are destroyed, together with the means of support of thousands of people, provides that in any action commenced prior to March 1, 1935, in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Banking Commission v. WutschelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PendarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API