Legal Opinion
United States v. Russell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1990No. Nos. 89-2652 to 89-2655 and 89-2894PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STROM, District Judge.
Ricky Russell, Charles Moore, Willie Walker, Gilbert Stumpe and Anthony J. Taylor (hereinafter sometimes referred to as defendants) pled guilty to possession of stolen property valued in excess of $100 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. They were sentenced under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). Russell, Moore, Walker, and Stumpe appeal their sentences. Russell also contends that the district court1 erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The United States (hereinafter, the government) cross-appeals with respect to Russell, Moore, Stumpe and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Ernest R. Streeter, United States of America v. Robert Jay CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. David Big Crow, United States of America v. David Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Bruce Wayne AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Ofchinick, Daniel R. (Jr.). Appeal of Daniel Ofchinick, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Brian S. CollarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. John L. St. CyrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Bennie Ray HardemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Fernando Diaz-Diaz, United States of America v. Fernando Diaz-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Stanley CottmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. James EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.