Legal Opinion
In Re Bookschnis
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 17, 1945No. 21702PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
The petitioner filed for naturalization under the provisions of Section 310(b) of the Naturalization Act of 1940 1 on the 27th day of September, 1944, by virtue of the fact that he is married to an American citizen. The case was set for hearing in open court pursuant to the plan heretofore adopted whereby consideration is now given to each naturalization case upon its merits. 2 It appeared upon the examination that the petitioner came to the United States in 1911, and that he is married to a citizen of the United States.
When it developed upon the examination…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In Re PaoliDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1943
- In Re McNeilDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1936
- In Re LawsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
- In Re RingnaldaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Carlos Marcello v. District Director of the Immigration & Naturalization Service, New Orleans, LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- In Re MogusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- In re LipsitzDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
- Petition for Naturalization of FerroDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- In re Naturalization of Yee Wing ToonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.