Legal Opinion

Bogert v. . Vermilya

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff declared in assumpsit against the defendant (whom in the commencement of the declaration he styles "the survivor of William Bruce") upon the money counts; the indebtedness and promises being stated as of "the defendant," without any addition of special character. To the declaration was annexed a copy of a joint and several promissory note, dated January 21, 1837, at three months, for $200 with interest, and made by Wm. Bruce and the defendant. The defendant pleaded the general issue and that the action did not accrue to the plaintiff at any time within six years next before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. DelafieldCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Christopher v. StockholmNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. People v. HaddockNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of ConnellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912
  2. Nellums v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bogert v. VermilyaNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Merritt v. SawyerNew York Supreme Court · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API