Hysmith v. Hysmith-Graham
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant challenges an order by which attorney’s fees were awarded, arguing that the trial court erred by reducing the amount requested. Although a reduction in attorney’s fees might ultimately be appropriate in this case, we must reverse the present order because the trial court failed to set forth specific findings regarding the attorney’s hourly rate, the number of hours reasonably expended, and the appropriateness of reduction or enhancement factors. See Fla. Patient’s Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). Accord Messana v. Seaside Cmty. Dev. Corp., 908 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Jones v. Associates Finance Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- T.G.G. v. P.M.L.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Messana v. SEASIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilkerson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Windsor Falls Condominium Association, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation v. Brendan Davis Janet Davis Unknown Tenant 31 k/n/a Shawna AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019