Legal Opinion

Gulfstream Micro Systems, Inc. v. Kingsbridge Boca Associates

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 11, 1990No. 89-1055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse an order granting a motion to correct and amend a judgment. The appellee initially moved only for relief on a claim of clerical mistake. Rule 1.540(a), Fla.R.Civ.P. At a hearing on that motion, fifteen months after the judgment, the ap-pellee, for the first time, orally sought to amend, pursuant to rule 1.540(b), to correct a substantive error due to excusable neglect or mistake.

It is clear that appellee was not entitled to relief under subsection (a) of the rule. Cf. Frisard v. Frisard, 497 So.2d 885 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); McKibbin v. Fujarek, 385 So.2d 724 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980);…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKibbin v. FujarekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Hutton v. SussmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Wilder v. WilderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. METRO. DADE COUNTY v. Certain LandsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Frisard v. FrisardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lorant v. Whitney National Bank, JOL, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Dolin v. DolinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Karl Tucker v. Jammie Tucker N/K/A Jammie Renae LancasterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API