Legal Opinion

Gte Mobilnet of Ohio v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1997No. 96-3025PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

111 F.3d 469

65 USLW 2691, 7 Communications Reg. (P&F) 700

GTE MOBILNET OF OHIO; Ohio RSA # 3; GTE Mobilnet

Incorporated,

Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants (96-3025),

New Par; Northern Ohio Cellular Telephone Company; Akron

Cellular Telephone Company; Canton Cellular Telephone

Company; Columbus Cellular Telephone Company;

Lorain/Elyria Cellular Telephone Company; Cellular

Communications of Mansfield; Airtouch Cellular of Ohio,

formerly known as Pactel Cellular of Ohio; Cellular

Communications Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

David W. JOHNSON; Ronda Hartman Fergus; Richard M.

Fanelly; Jolyn Barry…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cerveny v. Aventis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Gte North, Inc. v. John G. StrandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Minnesota Living Assistance v. Ken B. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  4. Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Community Treatment Centers, Inc. v. City of WestlandDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API