Nash v. AMR Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REVIEW OF ORDER ON APPELLATE ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
BROWNING, J.
This ease is before us on a motion filed by counsel for the claimant, Kenny Nash, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(c), for review of the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC) order on appellate attorney’s fees and costs. See Pellar v. Granger Asphalt Paving, Inc., 687 So.2d 282, 284-85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (setting out procedure under the rule governing motions for review and stating that orders setting amount of appellate attorney’s fees are reviewable on the merits *1207under the abuse of discretion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Binger v. King Pest ControlSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Batista v. Walter & BernsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. ArmasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Pellar v. Granger Asphalt Paving, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Medical Logistics, Inc. v. MarchinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.