Legal Opinion

Rust-Oleum Corporation v. NIC Industries, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 15, 2025No. 1:18-cv-01655Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION, Case No. 1:18-cv-01655-CL Plaintiff / Counter Defendant, OPINION AND ORDER v. NIC INDUSTRIES, INC., □ Defendant / Counter Claimant. CLARKE, MagistrateJudge. Before the Court for consideration is NIC’s motion for attorney fees (#401). For the reasons below, NIC’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. BACKGROUND The facts of this case have been thoroughly detailed in prior Opinion and Orders of this ‘Court and are well known to the parties. NIC has prevailed on all of the claims and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API