Coleman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
— The motion is addressed to the criticism of the instruction given to the jury defining intoxicating liquor. In the evidence the liquid is described as home brew, and witnesses who drank some of it testified that it was intoxicating. Such evidence has been held competent on many occasions. See Joyce on Intoxicating Liquors, sec. 674; Terry v. State, 44 Tex. Crim. Rep. 411. Testimony was given describing the effect produced by drinking the liquid. This was also competent. Joyce on Intoxicating Liquor, sec. 674; Taylor v. State, 44 Tex. Crim.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eubank v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Henson Pettigrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929