Legal Opinion
Woods v. Woods
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 8, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries. The declaration is in three counts, all for the same cause of action. The first count alleges that the plaintiff was a passenger for hire and was injured by negligence of the defendant; the second count alleges that the plaintiff at the time of the injury was a passenger on the defendant’s truck, that he was employed by and on the business of one George H. Woods, that he was rightfully on the truck while it was being used and operated by the defendant in carrying on the business of said George H. Woods, and that he sustained personal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lyttle v. MontoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Curley v. MahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Labatte v. LavalleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Adamian v. MesserlianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Foley v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ruel v. LangelierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Taylor v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- McDowell v. DyeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- O'BRIEN v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Dinardi v. HerookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.