Legal Opinion

Morley Sewing-Machine Co. v. Lancaster

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided March 5, 1885PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The present case arises upon an alleged infringement of letters patent to James H. Morley, dated January 4, 1881, for improvements in button-sewing machines. The invention relates to the automatic mechanical sewing of buttons to a fabric, and, on the evidence before us, we think Morley may fairly lay claim to have invented the first practical machine for accomplishing this result. In view of the position taken by the learned counsel for complainants, based on the claim that Morley was a pioneer in the art, and his invention a primary one, it is necessary to clearly understand at the outset…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. McCormick v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Clough v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Wicke v. OstrumSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunt, Helm, Ferris & Co. v. Milwaukee Hay Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
  2. Benjamin v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API