Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Warren Circuit Court. I. This was not a congregation “met” or “assembled” at the time the acts complained of were committed, and the defendant is not guilty as charged in the indictment. (32 Mo., 548.)

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

The defendant was convicted on an indictment for disturbing a congregation-, met for worship.

The indictment was framed under section 30, 1 W. S., 504, which reads as follows : “Every person who shall willfully, maliciously or contemptuously disquiet or disturb any camp-meeting, congregation, or other assembly, met for religious worship, by making a noise, or by rude or indecent behavior, or profane discourse within their place of worship, or so near to the same as to disturb the order or solemnity of the meeting, or menace, threaten or assault any person there being, shall be deemed guilty of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BankheadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Stark v. LoveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. State v. LeonardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API