Legal Opinion

United States v. Steed

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 18, 2009No. 08-2607Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Samuel Steed pleaded guilty to possession of an unregistered destructive device, see 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), manufacture of a pipe bomb, see id. § 5861(f), and possession of a firearm (pipe bomb) after a felony conviction, see 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). At sentencing the district court found that Steed had used the pipe bomb to try to dissuade his girlfriend from contacting the police about his manufacture of methamphetamine. Therefore the court applied a four-level increase to the offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6), for Steed’s use of the pipe bomb “in connection with” his commission…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Terrance E. BlalockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Michael LepageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Darryl BryantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API